Embarrasment occurs when a projected image is threatened. Discomfiture is low status. One can either dispel it when it has occurred, or avoid it in the first place. The quality of dispelling it is referred to as composure or poise. One can also avoid embarssemnt to oneself or others. This is referred to as graciousness or tact. Removing embarassment is important because It affects the pleasure or displeasue of the social encounter and the amount of affection or hostility for the participants. The lack of embarassment helps other people to continue playing their parts.
Goffman’s sense of “Action” is of the dramatic sort. This is the idea of important or meaningful or significant acts or events which are performed or are participated in by people. Action is merely a vehicle to uncover the deeper quality of character . This essay is an interesting and extended journey. It starts with discussion of games of chance and risk, and progresses to the larger sense of consequentiality in moments. One can kill time, and that killed time is inconsequential. There is an apparent axis of actions: consequential versus inconsequential, apart from that there becomes a question of whether actions are problematic, when one is at odds to figure out what to do. (p. 164)
Erving Goffman (1922-1982) held the position of Benjamin Franklin Professor of Anthropology and Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania. He served as President of the American Sociological Association in the year leading up to his death in 1982. Goffman is considered as the pioneer of the study of face-to-face interaction and has made a substantial contribution to micro-sociology. He is recognised as a major figure in the symbolic interaction perspective. In 2007 he was listed as the sixth most cited author in the humanities and social sciences (The Times Higher Education Guide, 2007).
‘On face-work’ is Goffman’s first essay from his book entitled ‘Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior’ which was originally written in 1955. It considers the approaches to human interaction alongside five more essays featured in this book and focuses on the concept of the face. His essay on face-work offers an analytic study which explores interaction as a ritual process. It is instrumental in providing a sound understanding of the definition of face and is a comprehensive insight into basic kinds of face-work.
Some of Goffman’s other works include ‘The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life’, ‘Asylums’, and ‘Stigma’ which are a series of books about social behaviour. They are often referred to as modern classics. The essay on face-work can be considered as an expansion of Goffman’s previous works on interaction and included in this series.
Goffman refers to his essay on face-work as ‘An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction’ (Goffman, ). He essentially sets out to prove to the reader that social interaction is a ritual game that we act out and play by the rules. The ...
... middle of paper ...
..., P., & Plax, T. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education, 38, 214–229. Retrieved from
Bylund, C., Peterson, E., & Cameron, K. (2011). A practitioner’s guide to interpersonal communication theory: An overview and exploration of selected theories. Patient Education and Counselling. Volume 87. Issue 3. Pages 261- 267. doi: /.
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London:Thousand Oaks:
Carson, C., & Cupach, W. (2000). Facing Corrections in the Workplace: The Influence of Perceived Face Threat on the Consequences of Managerial Reproaches. Journal of Applied Communication Research, (3).
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Bahavior. New York:Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Read Full Essay Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper